Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
Infect Immun ; 90(5): e0033421, 2022 05 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1883264

ABSTRACT

To identify sequences with a role in microbial pathogenesis, we assessed the adequacy of their annotation by existing controlled vocabularies and sequence databases. Our goal was to regularize descriptions of microbial pathogenesis for improved integration with bioinformatic applications. Here, we review the challenges of annotating sequences for pathogenic activity. We relate the categorization of more than 2,750 sequences of pathogenic microbes through a controlled vocabulary called Functions of Sequences of Concern (FunSoCs). These allow for an ease of description by both humans and machines. We provide a subset of 220 fully annotated sequences in the supplemental material as examples. The use of this compact (∼30 terms), controlled vocabulary has potential benefits for research in microbial genomics, public health, biosecurity, biosurveillance, and the characterization of new and emerging pathogens.


Subject(s)
Computational Biology , Vocabulary, Controlled , Humans
2.
J Bacteriol ; 204(6): e0013622, 2022 06 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1832334

ABSTRACT

Michigan State University was honored to host in-person the 27th Annual Midwest Microbial Pathogenesis Conference from 17 to 19 September 2021 in East Lansing, MI. Here, we report the precautions that were used to host a safe, in-person meeting during the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) pandemic and the research on microbial pathogenesis that was presented at the meeting. One of the most significant impacts of the SARS-CoV2 pandemic on the scientific community is the cancelation of many in-person scientific conferences. This has limited the ability of scientists, especially those who are early in their careers, to present their research and establish scientific networks and collaborations. Using a series of safety precautions, we describe here how we implemented a highly successful in-person meeting of 280 attendees in September 2021. Six of the research projects presented at this meeting are being published together in this issue of the Journal of Bacteriology.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/prevention & control , Humans , Pandemics/prevention & control , RNA, Viral , Universities
3.
Microbiol Spectr ; 9(3): e0139721, 2021 12 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1532983

ABSTRACT

Human clinical studies investigating use of convalescent plasma (CP) for treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) have produced conflicting results. Outcomes in these studies may vary at least partly due to different timing of CP administration relative to symptom onset. The mechanisms of action of CP include neutralizing antibodies but may extend beyond virus neutralization to include normalization of blood clotting and dampening of inflammation. Unresolved questions include the minimum therapeutic titer in the CP units or CP recipient as well as the optimal timing of administration. Here, we show that treatment of macaques with CP within 24 h of infection does not reduce viral shedding in nasal or lung secretions compared to controls and does not detectably improve any clinical endpoint. We also demonstrate that CP administration does not impact viral sequence diversity in vivo, although the selection of a viral sequence variant in both macaques receiving normal human plasma was suggestive of immune pressure. Our results suggest that CP, administered to medium titers, has limited efficacy, even when given very early after infection. Our findings also contribute information important for the continued development of the nonhuman primate model of COVID-19. These results should inform interpretation of clinical studies of CP in addition to providing insights useful for developing other passive immunotherapies and vaccine strategies. IMPORTANCE Antiviral treatment options for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) remain very limited. One treatment that was explored beginning early in the pandemic (and that is likely to be tested early in future pandemics) is plasma collected from people who have recovered from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), known as convalescent plasma (CP). We tested if CP reduces viral shedding or disease in a nonhuman primate model. Our results demonstrate that administration of CP 1 day after SARS-CoV-2 infection had no significant impact on viral loads, clinical disease, or sequence diversity, although treatment with normal human plasma resulted in selection of a specific viral variant. Our results demonstrate that passive immunization with CP, even during early infection, provided no significant benefit in a nonhuman primate model of SARS-CoV-2 infection.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/therapy , Immunization, Passive/methods , SARS-CoV-2 , Animals , Antibodies, Neutralizing/immunology , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/immunology , Disease Models, Animal , Humans , Immunity , Lung/pathology , Macaca mulatta , Pandemics , Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus/immunology , Viral Load , Virus Replication
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL